description>
Overflow
develops in two consecutive stages. The second is a flexible, changing
installation responding to the architecture, socio-geographic location
and history of Centre A's space, built using glass drink bottles obtained
during the first stage, in which the gallery participates in one of
the more visible unofficial economies of the neighbourhood - the recuperation
and redemption of bottles from across the city.
Centre A is located in Vancouver's Downtown East Side, an area marked
by poverty and mental illness, substance abuse and drug traffic, increasing
redevelopment and gentrification, tourism and entertainment consumption,
and socio-political frictions arising from the economic disparity and
divergent interests of the various local users and stakeholders - including
poor residents, the transient population, homeowners, business people,
real-estate developers, consumers, tourists, cultural groups, and social-service
organizations - and those in the underground economies, such as drug
dealers and users. One of the most visible trades in this neighbourhood
is the considerable number of poor citizens making a living by gathering
and returning bottles for refunds, an aspect of the ad hoc local economy
that has over the years become regularized, as well as recognized and
widely supported by the city population.
The gallery occupies a historic building that
architecturally retains evidence of its former use as a streetcar terminus.
It is positioned to become one of an increasing number of cultural,
heritage and social organizations whose below-market-cost locations
are a result of concessions granted to developers by the City of Vancouver
in exchange for housing such groups - a process widely understood to
be the soft edge of gentrification, even though the process is not controlled
by the groups in question.
One of the gallery's neighbours is United We
Can, the largest bottle depot in the Downtown East Side. UWC is a successful
private enterprise that regularly operates over-capacity, and whose
principals have developed a proposal for a full-scale recycling centre
to be located underneath a nearby highway overpass on the edge of the
neighbourhood.
In the months preceding the installation, through
the 2006 holiday season, Centre A will buy bottles from several local
collectors and collaborate with United We Can by relieving them of incoming
bottles that cannot be recycled by breweries. The re-use of materials
that would otherwise be a liability for UWC - pure excess - supports
the argument that a considered plan for local processing of all kinds
of reusable waste is not only crucial but also right - a proper response
to locally-generated consumer glut.
The installation itself will be a flexible mass of glass bottles arranged
on the concrete floor and around the brick pillars and office furnishings
of the vast space, lit primarily by the natural light from the wall
of windows overlooking Hastings Street. With their labels removed, the
bottles appear both as abstract tokens for human presence and as a sparkling,
seemingly liquid volume. In keeping with the moveable nature of the
materials, the arrangement will likely change over the course of the
exhibition, perhaps ranging from an unordered mass spreading across
the space like an encroaching tide, to an obstructive yet contemplative
presence, to more orderly patterns that might recall the sorting of
railcars or the movement of goods through the nearby port.
In any configuration, however,
there will be tension between the now-pristine bottles and the fact
that they represent not only a humble yet economically valuable raw
material that is a precious local resource and a subject of street-level
expertise, but also alcoholism - one of the neighbourhood's scourges.
It is possible that the attractiveness and apparent value of the materials,
displayed in all their uselessness in the somewhat refined gallery space,
could draw out some of the neighbourhood's underlying interests, economic
incongruities and incommensurate social facts, including the gallery's
uneasy position as a possible contributor to the gentrification of the
neighbourhood.
credits>
Produced in collaboration with United We Can. Special thanks to Ken
Lyotier and Hank Bull for furthering the development of the project.